It is the ultimate irony that, in so many fields, science and technology have been given the dubious distinction of being more useful than the great majority of other ways of doing business, as people claim that they should provide the highest standards of integrity and security for the whole enterprise and its employees. But it is time that they stop being such bigots, in so many ways.
There has been much talk about the dangers of technical analysts, with warnings by the industry itself about the growing threat of technical analysis on the part of corporations. It is one thing to be aware that companies need to be very concerned about technical analysis. It is another to see that every business enterprise in the world has some level of technical analysis.
In this sense, you need not look much deeper than the latest spate of reports out of some very secretive, non-government agencies and think tanks looking at what companies do about technical investigations, whether by outside parties or by the industry itself. We are certainly aware of reports from the Office of Government Ethics that some large corporations require that managers, especially senior corporate managers, have some level of understanding of, and be familiar with, the security procedures that they and others need to follow. We know of reports from companies that have policies about who handles security issues, but those are hardly exclusive to corporate security experts. The number of companies that don’t ask all of their security advisors—some of whom are even non-technologists—what their security policies are, may well be large. (See “What’s Behind the Latest Stakes for the Technology Industry?” for an example of such a policy.)
But there is also a fundamental misconception about all of this, because in effect, the companies that are talking about things like these and the industry itself are saying that the very nature of software engineering has become so complex that the very nature of security analysis is no longer even possible. In other words, all security analysts are not equal. There are plenty of them. But all of them can’t be as good as a professional, experienced analyst.
In other industries, such as accounting, for example, the difference between the professional and the junior analyst could not possibly be more obvious. In accounting, junior analysts are often given some of the senior credit for the accounting process. For example, a professional who is assigned to an accounting office, even though he is a less experienced auditor, could still have an important role.
In the same way, for some industries, even the very concept of “security
best online stock trading courses in india, swing trading course pdf, swing trading dvd, bullish swing setup, swing trading strategies